| drawing conclusions is left as an exercise to the reader |
[Dec. 10th, 2007|03:25 pm] |
Fedora 8 statistics, gathered on 2007-12-09.
(Uses rhpkgers.py written by Toshio Kuratomi.)
Total SRPM (source RPM) packages in Fedora 8 is 5059.
3033 (60%) are maintained solely by non-RH developers.
1453 (29%) are maintained solely by RH developers.
569 (11%) are co-maintained by both RH and non-RH developers.
4 ( 0%) are orphaned, and are in need of a maintainer.
The total number of non-RH maintainers is 276.
The total number of RH maintainers is 202.
Ignoring the co-maintained and orphaned packages:
3033 / 276 = 11.0 packages per non-RH maintainer.
1453 / 202 = 7.2 packages per RH maintainer.
|
|
|
| Comments: |
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/10592686/1986) | From: ![[info]](http://p-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif) jspaleta
2007-12-10 09:06 pm (UTC)
Stats only breed more questions | (Link)
|
So here's a noodle bending question....
What's the breakdown look like for binary packages that make it on to each published spin image? Rational logic would dictate that FEL and KDE and Games spins would have a higher percentage of community maintained software compared to the Gnome-centric desktop spin or that of the DVD installer image payload, the later two having a stronger claim to a Core pedigree. It would be interesting to see the relative comparison in spin payloads look like.
-jef
![[User Picture]](http://p-userpic.livejournal.com/71547031/14946227) | From: jaobedoza
2008-03-19 03:02 pm (UTC)
Re: Stats only breed more questions | (Link)
|
what are stats really for? to add to questions to the already confused mind?
From: deludedian
2008-04-14 01:14 am (UTC)
Re: Stats only breed more questions | (Link)
|
95% of statistics are made up. John. | |
